<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 300 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94193</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai concluded that there was insufficient justification for enhancing the declared value of imported rubber in both sets of appeals. The decision highlighted the significance of contractual terms, market dynamics, and legal provisions in determining the appropriate value for duty calculation. This judgment provides insights into the complexities of duty assessment on imported goods and establishes a precedent for similar cases in the future.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:58:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 300 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94193</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai concluded that there was insufficient justification for enhancing the declared value of imported rubber in both sets of appeals. The decision highlighted the significance of contractual terms, market dynamics, and legal provisions in determining the appropriate value for duty calculation. This judgment provides insights into the complexities of duty assessment on imported goods and establishes a precedent for similar cases in the future.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>