<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 351 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94189</link>
    <description>Intermediate products arising during continuous bulk-drug manufacture are not excisable unless the Revenue establishes marketability through reliable evidence, such as testing, market enquiry, or technical material. Crude products captively consumed in further manufacture, without evidence of sale or marketability, do not sustain a duty demand. Extended limitation is unavailable where the manufacturing process was disclosed to and known by the Department, and no deliberate suppression or wilful misstatement intended to evade duty is proved. On these principles, the duty demand, penalty, and confiscation were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:48:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 351 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94189</link>
      <description>Intermediate products arising during continuous bulk-drug manufacture are not excisable unless the Revenue establishes marketability through reliable evidence, such as testing, market enquiry, or technical material. Crude products captively consumed in further manufacture, without evidence of sale or marketability, do not sustain a duty demand. Extended limitation is unavailable where the manufacturing process was disclosed to and known by the Department, and no deliberate suppression or wilful misstatement intended to evade duty is proved. On these principles, the duty demand, penalty, and confiscation were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>