<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 353 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94180</link>
    <description>Fork lift trucks and cranes used to move raw materials to machines and shift finished goods to storage were treated as material handling equipment used in the manufacturing stream, and therefore as capital goods within Rule 57Q. Prior Tribunal decisions holding such items to be modvatable remained operative because they had not been stayed, and a reference on the issue did not displace that precedent. Modvat credit on fork lift trucks and cranes was admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:10:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 353 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94180</link>
      <description>Fork lift trucks and cranes used to move raw materials to machines and shift finished goods to storage were treated as material handling equipment used in the manufacturing stream, and therefore as capital goods within Rule 57Q. Prior Tribunal decisions holding such items to be modvatable remained operative because they had not been stayed, and a reference on the issue did not displace that precedent. Modvat credit on fork lift trucks and cranes was admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>