https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94179 Eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 77/83 turned on whether the final product satisfied the prescribed limits on clearance value and investment in plant and machinery. The claim had been rejected as unsubstantiated, but because the same issue for a different period had already been remanded in the appellants' own case, the matter was treated on the same footing. The impugned order was set aside and the case was remanded for fresh adjudication of exemption eligibility. en-us Wed, 20 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94179 Eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 77/83 turned on whether the final product satisfied the prescribed limits on clearance value and investment in plant and machinery. The claim had been rejected as unsubstantiated, but because the same issue for a different period had already been remanded in the appellants' own case, the matter was treated on the same footing. The impugned order was set aside and the case was remanded for fresh adjudication of exemption eligibility. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 20 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94179