https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94178 A central excise demand cannot be confirmed beyond the scope of the show cause notice, so the portion relating to clearances outside the three AR3A entries was set aside. The notice was not invalid merely because it did not state a quantified duty figure, as the AR3A-wise particulars were sufficient to compute liability. Modvat credit was not admissible on inputs used in final products cleared without payment of duty for the period before 1-3-1992, so the demand relating to the three covered clearances was sustained. en-us Wed, 06 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:07:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94178 A central excise demand cannot be confirmed beyond the scope of the show cause notice, so the portion relating to clearances outside the three AR3A entries was set aside. The notice was not invalid merely because it did not state a quantified duty figure, as the AR3A-wise particulars were sufficient to compute liability. Modvat credit was not admissible on inputs used in final products cleared without payment of duty for the period before 1-3-1992, so the demand relating to the three covered clearances was sustained. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 May 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94178