<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 229 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94158</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding no intention to evade duty in the misdeclaration of imported goods case. They set aside the confiscation, fine, and penalty imposed by the Department. The matter was remanded to the Collector for reevaluation of the valuation dispute concerning the use of invoice value for assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:06:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 229 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94158</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding no intention to evade duty in the misdeclaration of imported goods case. They set aside the confiscation, fine, and penalty imposed by the Department. The matter was remanded to the Collector for reevaluation of the valuation dispute concerning the use of invoice value for assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>