https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94142 An appeal does not lie against the final finding of the Designated Authority in anti-dumping proceedings; the appealable event is the Government notification imposing anti-dumping duty, not the finding itself. No material showed that such a duty notification had been issued. In any event, any anti-dumping duty would cease after five years under Section 9A(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, and more than five years had elapsed from the notified finding. The challenge to the final finding was therefore rejected, and the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable and unnecessary to pursue further. en-us Tue, 07 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:11:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94142 An appeal does not lie against the final finding of the Designated Authority in anti-dumping proceedings; the appealable event is the Government notification imposing anti-dumping duty, not the finding itself. No material showed that such a duty notification had been issued. In any event, any anti-dumping duty would cease after five years under Section 9A(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, and more than five years had elapsed from the notified finding. The challenge to the final finding was therefore rejected, and the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable and unnecessary to pursue further. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 07 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94142