<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 240 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94117</link>
    <description>Interim relief was granted in a capacity-determination dispute under the Hot Air Stenter Independent Textile Processors Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1998, where the applicant challenged inclusion of gallery length in the chamber length used to compute annual capacity. Conflicting Tribunal views on the same computation issue showed a prima facie case for stay pending appeal, and operation of the impugned order was stayed during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:51:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 240 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94117</link>
      <description>Interim relief was granted in a capacity-determination dispute under the Hot Air Stenter Independent Textile Processors Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1998, where the applicant challenged inclusion of gallery length in the chamber length used to compute annual capacity. Conflicting Tribunal views on the same computation issue showed a prima facie case for stay pending appeal, and operation of the impugned order was stayed during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>