<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 387 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94112</link>
    <description>Reconditioned photocopier parts could not be classified as complete photocopiers under Rule 2(a) because the consignments together comprised only about 75 to 80 per cent of the required components and did not themselves constitute a complete machine. The classification adopted as photocopiers was therefore incorrect. Valuation based on the price of a full machine was unsustainable because the goods were admitted to be parts, no acceptable basis was shown for rejecting the declared transaction value, and no contemporaneous comparable imports were relied on. Misdeclaration, confiscation, penalties and the enhanced duty demand accordingly could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:41:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 387 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94112</link>
      <description>Reconditioned photocopier parts could not be classified as complete photocopiers under Rule 2(a) because the consignments together comprised only about 75 to 80 per cent of the required components and did not themselves constitute a complete machine. The classification adopted as photocopiers was therefore incorrect. Valuation based on the price of a full machine was unsustainable because the goods were admitted to be parts, no acceptable basis was shown for rejecting the declared transaction value, and no contemporaneous comparable imports were relied on. Misdeclaration, confiscation, penalties and the enhanced duty demand accordingly could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>