<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 362 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94087</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal due to the lack of legal infirmity. The Income-tax authorities&#039; coercive and threatening methods during stock verification were deemed unjustified, leading to the deletion of additions based on unreliable estimates. The Commissioner emphasized the lack of proper basis for demands of duty, confiscation, and penalties, ultimately setting aside actions initiated by the authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:45:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 362 - CEGAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94087</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal due to the lack of legal infirmity. The Income-tax authorities&#039; coercive and threatening methods during stock verification were deemed unjustified, leading to the deletion of additions based on unreliable estimates. The Commissioner emphasized the lack of proper basis for demands of duty, confiscation, and penalties, ultimately setting aside actions initiated by the authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>