<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 359 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94085</link>
    <description>A party cannot sustain an appeal on entirely new grounds raised for the first time before the appellate forum. The Tribunal held that the Revenue had changed its case from the original challenge to the classification list and later relied on a different statutory basis not urged before the lower authority. That amounted to an impermissible new case in appeal, so the appellate challenge could not be maintained. The classification dispute was therefore not examined on merits, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed because it was founded on grounds not previously taken.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:42:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 359 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94085</link>
      <description>A party cannot sustain an appeal on entirely new grounds raised for the first time before the appellate forum. The Tribunal held that the Revenue had changed its case from the original challenge to the classification list and later relied on a different statutory basis not urged before the lower authority. That amounted to an impermissible new case in appeal, so the appellate challenge could not be maintained. The classification dispute was therefore not examined on merits, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed because it was founded on grounds not previously taken.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>