<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 480 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94038</link>
    <description>Disclosure of the intended use of furnace oil in the licence application, together with the Department&#039;s processing of the application, grant of licence and issuance of CT-2 certificates, supported a strong prima facie case that the demand was time-barred and that suppression was not established for invoking the extended period. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the assessee as having made out a case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:57:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 480 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94038</link>
      <description>Disclosure of the intended use of furnace oil in the licence application, together with the Department&#039;s processing of the application, grant of licence and issuance of CT-2 certificates, supported a strong prima facie case that the demand was time-barred and that suppression was not established for invoking the extended period. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the assessee as having made out a case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>