<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 457 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94015</link>
    <description>Denial of requested cross-examination of the customs officer whose reports and Let Ship orders formed the basis of the dispute was treated as fatal where the decisive facts depended on that evidence. Because the evidentiary foundation for confiscation, penalty and denial of drawback could not be tested, the adjudication was found bad in law. The orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after permitting cross-examination of the concerned officer and other witnesses whose examination had been sought.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:35:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 457 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94015</link>
      <description>Denial of requested cross-examination of the customs officer whose reports and Let Ship orders formed the basis of the dispute was treated as fatal where the decisive facts depended on that evidence. Because the evidentiary foundation for confiscation, penalty and denial of drawback could not be tested, the adjudication was found bad in law. The orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after permitting cross-examination of the concerned officer and other witnesses whose examination had been sought.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>