<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 445 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94003</link>
    <description>Temporary import of durable empty tank containers for re-export was covered by Customs Notification No. 104/94-Cus. Customs retained control to ensure re-export within the stipulated period, and the Tribunal accepted that the container had been repeatedly imported and exported under the same policy. On that basis, the container was not treated as a prohibited import and confiscation was held unsustainable. The appeal succeeded with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:17:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 445 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94003</link>
      <description>Temporary import of durable empty tank containers for re-export was covered by Customs Notification No. 104/94-Cus. Customs retained control to ensure re-export within the stipulated period, and the Tribunal accepted that the container had been repeatedly imported and exported under the same policy. On that basis, the container was not treated as a prohibited import and confiscation was held unsustainable. The appeal succeeded with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>