<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 444 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94002</link>
    <description>Security furnished to meet the pre-deposit requirement under the Central Excise Act was to be returned where the earlier appeal had been allowed by remand. The amount already adjusted through the RG 23A Part II account was treated as credit available to the assessee, and only the unrecovered balance remained payable in cash. The Department was therefore directed to grant credit for the amount already adjusted and pay the remaining sum in cash by the stipulated date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:16:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 444 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94002</link>
      <description>Security furnished to meet the pre-deposit requirement under the Central Excise Act was to be returned where the earlier appeal had been allowed by remand. The amount already adjusted through the RG 23A Part II account was treated as credit available to the assessee, and only the unrecovered balance remained payable in cash. The Department was therefore directed to grant credit for the amount already adjusted and pay the remaining sum in cash by the stipulated date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=94002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>