https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93984 The Tribunal modified the differential duty demands, set aside the penalty on Shri Inderpal Singh in Appeal No. C/9/2000-A, and reduced the differential duty demand in Appeal No. C/8/2000-A. The appeals challenging the enhanced duty demand and penalties imposed were disposed of accordingly, with the Tribunal upholding the rejection of invoice value, assessment based on comparable goods, and penalties due to intentional misdeclaration of country of origin. en-us Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:14:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93984 The Tribunal modified the differential duty demands, set aside the penalty on Shri Inderpal Singh in Appeal No. C/9/2000-A, and reduced the differential duty demand in Appeal No. C/8/2000-A. The appeals challenging the enhanced duty demand and penalties imposed were disposed of accordingly, with the Tribunal upholding the rejection of invoice value, assessment based on comparable goods, and penalties due to intentional misdeclaration of country of origin. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93984