<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 425 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93983</link>
    <description>The Tribunal waived penalties for Enron and J.M. Baxi &amp;amp; Co. in a case involving wrongful importation and non-compliance with customs formalities. The exoneration of ONGC from penalties raised questions about the inconsistent treatment of entities. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of clear evidence in determining liability and the need for consistency in decision-making across similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:12:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 425 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93983</link>
      <description>The Tribunal waived penalties for Enron and J.M. Baxi &amp;amp; Co. in a case involving wrongful importation and non-compliance with customs formalities. The exoneration of ONGC from penalties raised questions about the inconsistent treatment of entities. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of clear evidence in determining liability and the need for consistency in decision-making across similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>