<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 423 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93981</link>
    <description>Small scale industry exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. could not be denied merely because porcelain insulated blanks bore another unit&#039;s brand name, where the blanks were supplied only as components for further manufacture into electrical fuses and were not sold in the market as such. The factual finding that the goods were not cleared as traded branded goods remained unrebutted, so the brand name was not used in the course of trade for the goods themselves. The demand was therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:04:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 423 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93981</link>
      <description>Small scale industry exemption under Notification No. 175/86-C.E. could not be denied merely because porcelain insulated blanks bore another unit&#039;s brand name, where the blanks were supplied only as components for further manufacture into electrical fuses and were not sold in the market as such. The factual finding that the goods were not cleared as traded branded goods remained unrebutted, so the brand name was not used in the course of trade for the goods themselves. The demand was therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>