https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93977 The appeal was restored because the earlier disposal was not treated as final where the declaration under Rule 96ZP(3) was not the only issue requiring consideration and other questions remained open for argument. On that basis, the order dismissing the appeal was recalled, and the appeal was directed to be heard afresh in its original number on the scheduled date. en-us Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:57:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93977 The appeal was restored because the earlier disposal was not treated as final where the declaration under Rule 96ZP(3) was not the only issue requiring consideration and other questions remained open for argument. On that basis, the order dismissing the appeal was recalled, and the appeal was directed to be heard afresh in its original number on the scheduled date. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93977