<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 408 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93966</link>
    <description>Skid mounted transportable service unit was classified under heading 8479.00 because it performed multiple essential functions-cleaning, lubricating and filling oil-without any single principal function. Note 7 of Chapter 84 therefore directed the goods to the residual heading for machinery having individual functions, rather than headings 8467.00 or 8414.80 proposed by the Revenue. The Tribunal also followed its earlier decision in the same assessee&#039;s case and found the impugned orders consistent with the chapter note and the HSN. Classification under heading 8479.00 was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:23:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 408 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93966</link>
      <description>Skid mounted transportable service unit was classified under heading 8479.00 because it performed multiple essential functions-cleaning, lubricating and filling oil-without any single principal function. Note 7 of Chapter 84 therefore directed the goods to the residual heading for machinery having individual functions, rather than headings 8467.00 or 8414.80 proposed by the Revenue. The Tribunal also followed its earlier decision in the same assessee&#039;s case and found the impugned orders consistent with the chapter note and the HSN. Classification under heading 8479.00 was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>