<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 401 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93959</link>
    <description>A push button station with control elements, terminals, indication lamps and actuators wired together for a special motor-starting function was treated as electrical apparatus distinct from a mere switch and classified under Heading 8536.90. On that basis, it did not fall within the notification&#039;s exclusion for switches, so the concessional rate under Notification No. 160/86 was available. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to both the classification and the exemption was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:01:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=131019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 401 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93959</link>
      <description>A push button station with control elements, terminals, indication lamps and actuators wired together for a special motor-starting function was treated as electrical apparatus distinct from a mere switch and classified under Heading 8536.90. On that basis, it did not fall within the notification&#039;s exclusion for switches, so the concessional rate under Notification No. 160/86 was available. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to both the classification and the exemption was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>