https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93942 Retracted statements, unsupported hearsay and general allegations of syndicate involvement were treated as insufficient to show a prima facie case against the appellants in relation to alleged diversion of Nepal-bound cargo. Cross-examination suggested a co-appellant's name had been introduced at the department's instance, and a later Commissioner's order finding no sufficient evidence against two appellants reinforced that assessment. On that evidentiary basis, the penalties and confiscation order did not justify denial of unconditional stay, and the stay petition was allowed unconditionally. en-us Tue, 01 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:50:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93942 Retracted statements, unsupported hearsay and general allegations of syndicate involvement were treated as insufficient to show a prima facie case against the appellants in relation to alleged diversion of Nepal-bound cargo. Cross-examination suggested a co-appellant's name had been introduced at the department's instance, and a later Commissioner's order finding no sufficient evidence against two appellants reinforced that assessment. On that evidentiary basis, the penalties and confiscation order did not justify denial of unconditional stay, and the stay petition was allowed unconditionally. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 01 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93942