https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93924 A request to recall or review a stay order directing pre-deposit was rejected because no fresh material was shown to justify interference with the earlier determination, and the Tribunal found no basis to reopen the substantially reduced pre-deposit already ordered. The plea based on financial hardship did not warrant recall or modification on the existing record. However, in the interest of justice, limited relief was granted by allowing compliance with the ordered pre-deposit in monthly instalments and by extending time for the individual applicants to make the deposit. en-us Mon, 17 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:02:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93924 A request to recall or review a stay order directing pre-deposit was rejected because no fresh material was shown to justify interference with the earlier determination, and the Tribunal found no basis to reopen the substantially reduced pre-deposit already ordered. The plea based on financial hardship did not warrant recall or modification on the existing record. However, in the interest of justice, limited relief was granted by allowing compliance with the ordered pre-deposit in monthly instalments and by extending time for the individual applicants to make the deposit. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 17 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93924