https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93913 The appeal was allowed by Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) decision due to failure to deposit duty for proof of exports. The Tribunal held that the exporter, as per the bond to the Maritime Commissioner, was responsible, citing Circular No. 87/87/94. The Tribunal found a strong prima facie case and directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the appeal without requiring any deposit. en-us Thu, 06 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:26:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93913 The appeal was allowed by Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Mumbai, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) decision due to failure to deposit duty for proof of exports. The Tribunal held that the exporter, as per the bond to the Maritime Commissioner, was responsible, citing Circular No. 87/87/94. The Tribunal found a strong prima facie case and directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the appeal without requiring any deposit. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93913