<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 407 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93906</link>
    <description>A declaration filed on the date the factory was installed could not be treated as belated, so there was no valid basis to deny Modvat credit for want of filing before that date. On that footing, the delay was condoned and the assessee was held entitled to Modvat credit, with consequential relief granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:02:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 407 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93906</link>
      <description>A declaration filed on the date the factory was installed could not be treated as belated, so there was no valid basis to deny Modvat credit for want of filing before that date. On that footing, the delay was condoned and the assessee was held entitled to Modvat credit, with consequential relief granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>