https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93905 The Tribunal declined to grant early or out-of-turn hearing, treating priority listing as a case-management discretion governed by its institutional guidelines and current arrear position. It noted that matters are normally prioritised where the amount involved is around Rs. one crore, and that the applicant's complaint about lower duty paid by competitors was unsupported by any record of departmental action in comparable cases. The Tribunal also observed that an earlier decision in the applicant's own case was adverse, while alternative classification arguments could be considered at final hearing. Reconsideration of priority listing was left open only if infrastructure improves within a reasonable time. en-us Fri, 30 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:00:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93905 The Tribunal declined to grant early or out-of-turn hearing, treating priority listing as a case-management discretion governed by its institutional guidelines and current arrear position. It noted that matters are normally prioritised where the amount involved is around Rs. one crore, and that the applicant's complaint about lower duty paid by competitors was unsupported by any record of departmental action in comparable cases. The Tribunal also observed that an earlier decision in the applicant's own case was adverse, while alternative classification arguments could be considered at final hearing. Reconsideration of priority listing was left open only if infrastructure improves within a reasonable time. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 30 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93905