<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 337 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93881</link>
    <description>Side and centre connections for an impedance bond were classified by their essential character as insulated electrical conductors rather than as parts of railway signalling equipment. Their use in a railway track circuit did not, by itself, make them railway signalling, safety or traffic control equipment. Applying the classification principle, the goods fell under Heading 85.44 and not under Heading 85.30.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:42:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 337 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93881</link>
      <description>Side and centre connections for an impedance bond were classified by their essential character as insulated electrical conductors rather than as parts of railway signalling equipment. Their use in a railway track circuit did not, by itself, make them railway signalling, safety or traffic control equipment. Applying the classification principle, the goods fell under Heading 85.44 and not under Heading 85.30.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>