<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 332 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93877</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Reference application, emphasizing that no reference application should be filed against an interim order based on the provisions of the Central Excise Act and established legal precedents. The Commissioner&#039;s failure to adhere to the correct procedure led to the dismissal of the application, with a directive to send a copy of the order to the Chairman, CBEC for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:36:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 332 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93877</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Reference application, emphasizing that no reference application should be filed against an interim order based on the provisions of the Central Excise Act and established legal precedents. The Commissioner&#039;s failure to adhere to the correct procedure led to the dismissal of the application, with a directive to send a copy of the order to the Chairman, CBEC for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>