https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93874 Non-fulfilment of export obligations under an Advance Licence scheme was treated as sufficient to justify a substantial pre-deposit at the stay stage, because the reason for the failure was immaterial and no extension of the export period was shown to have been sought or granted. The applicants also did not plead financial hardship. On that basis, the Tribunal required a pre-deposit as a condition for hearing the appeals and stayed recovery of the balance duty and penalties only subject to compliance with the deposit direction. en-us Wed, 24 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:32:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93874 Non-fulfilment of export obligations under an Advance Licence scheme was treated as sufficient to justify a substantial pre-deposit at the stay stage, because the reason for the failure was immaterial and no extension of the export period was shown to have been sought or granted. The applicants also did not plead financial hardship. On that basis, the Tribunal required a pre-deposit as a condition for hearing the appeals and stayed recovery of the balance duty and penalties only subject to compliance with the deposit direction. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 24 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93874