<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 418 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93873</link>
    <description>A pre-deposit dispute turned on whether the appellants had shown a prima facie case and financial hardship sufficient for complete waiver of duty and penalty. The tribunal did not grant full waiver outright; it ordered deposit of Rs. 3 lakh within six weeks. On compliance, the balance duty and penalty were waived and recovery stayed, with the matter listed for compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:31:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 418 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93873</link>
      <description>A pre-deposit dispute turned on whether the appellants had shown a prima facie case and financial hardship sufficient for complete waiver of duty and penalty. The tribunal did not grant full waiver outright; it ordered deposit of Rs. 3 lakh within six weeks. On compliance, the balance duty and penalty were waived and recovery stayed, with the matter listed for compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>