<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 412 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93867</link>
    <description>Use of another person&#039;s brand name disentitles a manufacturer to small scale industry exemption where the notification bars such use; however, the extended limitation period cannot be invoked once the Department has knowledge of the brand ownership, so demand survives only for the earlier period. Installation charges are excluded from assessable value because they do not form part of the goods&#039; price, but after-sales service charges are includible in assessable value. The matter was remanded for recomputation of duty on the sustained period, with the penalty set aside and liberty to impose a fresh penalty after recalculation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:16:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 412 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93867</link>
      <description>Use of another person&#039;s brand name disentitles a manufacturer to small scale industry exemption where the notification bars such use; however, the extended limitation period cannot be invoked once the Department has knowledge of the brand ownership, so demand survives only for the earlier period. Installation charges are excluded from assessable value because they do not form part of the goods&#039; price, but after-sales service charges are includible in assessable value. The matter was remanded for recomputation of duty on the sustained period, with the penalty set aside and liberty to impose a fresh penalty after recalculation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>