https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93857 Subsequent administrative instructions were not accepted as sufficient cause to excuse delay in filing appeals where the Revenue had already allowed the appellate order to attain finality by not appealing within time. The text notes that the order under challenge did not rest on the Jawahar Mills decision, so later Board directions to contest similar matters did not justify the earlier default. On that basis, the delay was not condoned and the appeals were rejected as not maintainable in time. en-us Tue, 18 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:40:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93857 Subsequent administrative instructions were not accepted as sufficient cause to excuse delay in filing appeals where the Revenue had already allowed the appellate order to attain finality by not appealing within time. The text notes that the order under challenge did not rest on the Jawahar Mills decision, so later Board directions to contest similar matters did not justify the earlier default. On that basis, the delay was not condoned and the appeals were rejected as not maintainable in time. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93857