<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 277 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93840</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit of duty and penalty was treated as unnecessary where credit had been taken before installation of imported goods, but the goods were admittedly installed in the factory. Reversal of the premature credit and its re-credit after installation would create no net revenue effect, making the dispute revenue neutral. Relying on the applicable Larger Bench view, the matter was considered fit for waiver of pre-deposit, and recovery remained stayed during pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:46:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 277 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93840</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit of duty and penalty was treated as unnecessary where credit had been taken before installation of imported goods, but the goods were admittedly installed in the factory. Reversal of the premature credit and its re-credit after installation would create no net revenue effect, making the dispute revenue neutral. Relying on the applicable Larger Bench view, the matter was considered fit for waiver of pre-deposit, and recovery remained stayed during pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>