https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93825 An appeal under the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 was required to be accompanied by the copy of the Order-in-Original. Where the appellant repeatedly failed to file that mandatory document despite reminders, a show-cause notice, and further correspondence, the defect remained uncured and the appeal could not be entertained. The procedural default therefore justified dismissal under Rule 11. The stated principle is that non-compliance with an essential filing requirement, if not remedied after repeated s to cure, renders the appeal liable to dismissal under the applicable procedural rules. en-us Wed, 16 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:57:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93825 An appeal under the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 was required to be accompanied by the copy of the Order-in-Original. Where the appellant repeatedly failed to file that mandatory document despite reminders, a show-cause notice, and further correspondence, the defect remained uncured and the appeal could not be entertained. The procedural default therefore justified dismissal under Rule 11. The stated principle is that non-compliance with an essential filing requirement, if not remedied after repeated s to cure, renders the appeal liable to dismissal under the applicable procedural rules. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93825