<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 327 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93810</link>
    <description>Confiscation of a car and personal penalty were found unsustainable where the alleged contraband, on chemical examination, was DDT and not heroin, and the only incriminating material was a statement recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act. The Tribunal distinguished precedent relied on by the Customs Department because that case involved established smuggled gold, whereas the basic factual foundation of heroin smuggling was absent here. The appellant had also been discharged in the connected criminal case. On these facts, the earlier precedent was held inapplicable and the confiscation and penalty were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:56:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 327 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93810</link>
      <description>Confiscation of a car and personal penalty were found unsustainable where the alleged contraband, on chemical examination, was DDT and not heroin, and the only incriminating material was a statement recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act. The Tribunal distinguished precedent relied on by the Customs Department because that case involved established smuggled gold, whereas the basic factual foundation of heroin smuggling was absent here. The appellant had also been discharged in the connected criminal case. On these facts, the earlier precedent was held inapplicable and the confiscation and penalty were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>