<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 326 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93809</link>
    <description>A classification order could not be sustained where no written show cause notice proposed classification under the heading ultimately adopted. The Tribunal held that fair procedure required a written notice specifying the proposed classification, and an oral explanation before the Assistant Commissioner was insufficient. Because the assessee was not put on written notice of the heading relied on in the impugned order, the order was vitiated for breach of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:55:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 326 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93809</link>
      <description>A classification order could not be sustained where no written show cause notice proposed classification under the heading ultimately adopted. The Tribunal held that fair procedure required a written notice specifying the proposed classification, and an oral explanation before the Assistant Commissioner was insufficient. Because the assessee was not put on written notice of the heading relied on in the impugned order, the order was vitiated for breach of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>