<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 368 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93792</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the order-in-appeal No. 113-CE/BPL/2000 dated 24-1-2000, directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to expedite the disposal of the appeal against the original order dated 17-10-94. The appellant&#039;s disputed amount was remitted and would be adjusted based on the pending appeal&#039;s outcome. The Tribunal emphasized timely resolution within four weeks of its order, highlighting procedural irregularities and jurisdictional concerns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:30:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 368 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93792</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the order-in-appeal No. 113-CE/BPL/2000 dated 24-1-2000, directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to expedite the disposal of the appeal against the original order dated 17-10-94. The appellant&#039;s disputed amount was remitted and would be adjusted based on the pending appeal&#039;s outcome. The Tribunal emphasized timely resolution within four weeks of its order, highlighting procedural irregularities and jurisdictional concerns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>