https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93791 A departmental appeal must be supported by coherent authorisation and matching appeal documents; where the authorisation referred to one order, the statement of facts referred to another, and the refund figures in the papers also differed, the record showed lack of proper application of mind. Because the appeal did not correspond consistently with the orders sought to be challenged, it was held not maintainable and dismissed. en-us Fri, 28 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:29:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93791 A departmental appeal must be supported by coherent authorisation and matching appeal documents; where the authorisation referred to one order, the statement of facts referred to another, and the refund figures in the papers also differed, the record showed lack of proper application of mind. Because the appeal did not correspond consistently with the orders sought to be challenged, it was held not maintainable and dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93791