<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 353 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93777</link>
    <description>A party challenging duty and penalty demands may obtain waiver of pre-deposit where the record shows a strong prima facie case and the impugned order does not clearly identify the disputed non-compliances. The Tribunal noted that the penalty stemmed from alleged repair work without statutory records, while the duty issues concerned exports, Modvat credit, and a minor RT-12 related demand. It accepted that repair work may not amount to manufacture and found the export and Modvat objections required fuller examination at the final hearing. On that basis, it granted stay of recovery of the duties and penalties pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:36:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 353 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93777</link>
      <description>A party challenging duty and penalty demands may obtain waiver of pre-deposit where the record shows a strong prima facie case and the impugned order does not clearly identify the disputed non-compliances. The Tribunal noted that the penalty stemmed from alleged repair work without statutory records, while the duty issues concerned exports, Modvat credit, and a minor RT-12 related demand. It accepted that repair work may not amount to manufacture and found the export and Modvat objections required fuller examination at the final hearing. On that basis, it granted stay of recovery of the duties and penalties pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>