https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93774 The appeal (No. C/56/99-NB) was dismissed for non-compliance due to procedural errors in presenting the modification application. The appellant successfully argued for restoration of the appeal, citing financial constraints and unclear involvement in alleged smuggling. The Tribunal granted a two-month extension for full penalty payment, emphasizing the need for compliance with the deposit deadline. The modification application was rejected for lack of new information. en-us Wed, 19 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:31:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93774 The appeal (No. C/56/99-NB) was dismissed for non-compliance due to procedural errors in presenting the modification application. The appellant successfully argued for restoration of the appeal, citing financial constraints and unclear involvement in alleged smuggling. The Tribunal granted a two-month extension for full penalty payment, emphasizing the need for compliance with the deposit deadline. The modification application was rejected for lack of new information. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 19 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93774