<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 345 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93769</link>
    <description>Imported marble blocks were treated as liable to confiscation and penalty where the required import licence was not produced and customs warehousing had not been permitted, so liability in principle was sustained. The commentary also notes that, under the Exim Policy, warehousing could be relevant to clearance from warehouse rather than importation itself; because warehousing was unavailable and the goods were Italian marble blocks, the redemption fine and penalty were considered disproportionate and were reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:07:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 345 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93769</link>
      <description>Imported marble blocks were treated as liable to confiscation and penalty where the required import licence was not produced and customs warehousing had not been permitted, so liability in principle was sustained. The commentary also notes that, under the Exim Policy, warehousing could be relevant to clearance from warehouse rather than importation itself; because warehousing was unavailable and the goods were Italian marble blocks, the redemption fine and penalty were considered disproportionate and were reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>