https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93767 A classification dispute was remanded because the appellate authority did not consider an earlier Tribunal decision, even though the disputed goods appeared prima facie similar to those previously examined. The matter required fresh reconsideration by the jurisdictional Commissioner (Appeals) after hearing both sides and issuing a speaking appealable order. The appeals were accordingly allowed by way of remand for reconsideration in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 17 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:03:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93767 A classification dispute was remanded because the appellate authority did not consider an earlier Tribunal decision, even though the disputed goods appeared prima facie similar to those previously examined. The matter required fresh reconsideration by the jurisdictional Commissioner (Appeals) after hearing both sides and issuing a speaking appealable order. The appeals were accordingly allowed by way of remand for reconsideration in accordance with law. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 17 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93767