https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93757 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that the imported goods were not misdeclared, as duty was paid correctly. The goods were classified under the appropriate sub-heading of the Customs Tariff as aluminium scrap, rejecting the Department's contention for a different classification. Consequently, the imposition of redemption fine and penalty was deemed unjustified, leading to the appeal's success and setting aside of the Commissioner's order. en-us Fri, 14 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:18:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93757 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that the imported goods were not misdeclared, as duty was paid correctly. The goods were classified under the appropriate sub-heading of the Customs Tariff as aluminium scrap, rejecting the Department's contention for a different classification. Consequently, the imposition of redemption fine and penalty was deemed unjustified, leading to the appeal's success and setting aside of the Commissioner's order. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 14 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93757