<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 305 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93731</link>
    <description>Where the assessee demonstrated genuine financial incapacity and the factory had ceased operations after takeover by a financial institution, insistence on pre-deposit was not warranted. Interim relief was therefore granted by waiving pre-deposit and staying recovery. Since the appeal had not been decided on merits by the Commissioner (Appeals), the matter was remanded for de novo consideration with an opportunity of personal hearing, without insisting on pre-deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:10:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 305 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93731</link>
      <description>Where the assessee demonstrated genuine financial incapacity and the factory had ceased operations after takeover by a financial institution, insistence on pre-deposit was not warranted. Interim relief was therefore granted by waiving pre-deposit and staying recovery. Since the appeal had not been decided on merits by the Commissioner (Appeals), the matter was remanded for de novo consideration with an opportunity of personal hearing, without insisting on pre-deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>