https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93723 A reference application under section 35G(1) of the Central Excise Act was held not maintainable where the department itself framed the proposed questions as already answered in the negative and, in substance, sought to challenge the Tribunal's order as illegal and incorrect. The application did not satisfy the statutory requirements for a proper reference on a question of law, so no reference could be made and the application was rejected. en-us Fri, 23 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:49:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93723 A reference application under section 35G(1) of the Central Excise Act was held not maintainable where the department itself framed the proposed questions as already answered in the negative and, in substance, sought to challenge the Tribunal's order as illegal and incorrect. The application did not satisfy the statutory requirements for a proper reference on a question of law, so no reference could be made and the application was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 23 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93723