<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 283 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93709</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on J.B. Shah, Yashpal Wadhera, and Mukesh Sethi, while reducing the penalty on Pramod Kumar Pahwa. J.B. Shah&#039;s appeal was allowed due to lack of evidence linking him to the seized goods. Yashpal Wadhera&#039;s penalty was overturned as the seized goods were unrelated to him. Pramod Kumar Pahwa&#039;s penalty was reduced considering his low-paid employee status, and Mukesh Sethi&#039;s penalty was revoked due to insufficient evidence linking him to the seized goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:12:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 283 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93709</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed on J.B. Shah, Yashpal Wadhera, and Mukesh Sethi, while reducing the penalty on Pramod Kumar Pahwa. J.B. Shah&#039;s appeal was allowed due to lack of evidence linking him to the seized goods. Yashpal Wadhera&#039;s penalty was overturned as the seized goods were unrelated to him. Pramod Kumar Pahwa&#039;s penalty was reduced considering his low-paid employee status, and Mukesh Sethi&#039;s penalty was revoked due to insufficient evidence linking him to the seized goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>