<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 366 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93689</link>
    <description>Imported steel sheets found in sheet form and not hydraulically compressed bundles were not treated as light melting scrap, because the statutory definition under Note 6 to Section XV controlled and trade understanding could not override it; the customs notification benefit was therefore denied for that part of the consignment. For the remaining quantity, the alleged prime-quality new electrolytic tin plates were not shown to justify the higher contemporaneous import value, so a lower value comparable to rejected or waste sheet material was accepted. The assessable value was reduced and duty, redemption fine and penalty were directed to be recomputed on remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:14:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 366 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93689</link>
      <description>Imported steel sheets found in sheet form and not hydraulically compressed bundles were not treated as light melting scrap, because the statutory definition under Note 6 to Section XV controlled and trade understanding could not override it; the customs notification benefit was therefore denied for that part of the consignment. For the remaining quantity, the alleged prime-quality new electrolytic tin plates were not shown to justify the higher contemporaneous import value, so a lower value comparable to rejected or waste sheet material was accepted. The assessable value was reduced and duty, redemption fine and penalty were directed to be recomputed on remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>