<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 362 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93685</link>
    <description>A Finance Bill provision that deems packing or repacking of specified goods to be manufacture can take immediate effect under the Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931, so the inserted Note 6 in Chapter 34 applied to re-packed washing preparations cleared in March 1994 and rendered them dutiable. Clearance of the goods under another person&#039;s brand name also defeated small scale exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. where the notification denied relief for such branded goods; on the stated facts, use of the ineligible brand name on the packing made the exemption unavailable and the duty demand and penalty were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:00:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 362 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93685</link>
      <description>A Finance Bill provision that deems packing or repacking of specified goods to be manufacture can take immediate effect under the Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931, so the inserted Note 6 in Chapter 34 applied to re-packed washing preparations cleared in March 1994 and rendered them dutiable. Clearance of the goods under another person&#039;s brand name also defeated small scale exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. where the notification denied relief for such branded goods; on the stated facts, use of the ineligible brand name on the packing made the exemption unavailable and the duty demand and penalty were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>