<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 330 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93672</link>
    <description>Agglomerated marble made from crushed marble with cement, resin, pigments and other additives was held to be a composite article, not a natural mineral marble. Because the manufacturing process produced slabs and tiles materially different from marble as such, Heading 25.04 did not apply. The product was classified under the residual heading for articles of stone, Heading 68.07, on the basis that it was made mainly from marble chips bound with other materials.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:58:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 330 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93672</link>
      <description>Agglomerated marble made from crushed marble with cement, resin, pigments and other additives was held to be a composite article, not a natural mineral marble. Because the manufacturing process produced slabs and tiles materially different from marble as such, Heading 25.04 did not apply. The product was classified under the residual heading for articles of stone, Heading 68.07, on the basis that it was made mainly from marble chips bound with other materials.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>