<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 320 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93667</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure must be granted on settled criteria and not on a mistaken reading of precedent. In an economic offence, mere availability of the accused for interrogation was insufficient; the relevant consideration was whether the materials showed unnecessary harassment by the investigating agency. On the facts, the High Court had no justification to invoke Section 438, and the grant of anticipatory bail was liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=130727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 320 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93667</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure must be granted on settled criteria and not on a mistaken reading of precedent. In an economic offence, mere availability of the accused for interrogation was insufficient; the relevant consideration was whether the materials showed unnecessary harassment by the investigating agency. On the facts, the High Court had no justification to invoke Section 438, and the grant of anticipatory bail was liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=93667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>